Erika Jayne’s legal position has gone from a buzzing rumor to a very frightening reality.
For the cast of Beverly Hills themselves, the Real Housewives, that’s it.
After months of speculation worth months on whether Jane will face legal troubles as a result of her estranged husband’s alleged fraud scheme, we now have the answer.
And the answer is yes ..
On Friday, we learned that Jane was being sued for $ 25 million by a trustee overseeing a bankruptcy case involving the law firm of her estranged husband Tom Girardi, Girardi Keith. Rice field.
You know if you’re reading this, but Girardi is suspected of being a really vicious crime.
As a lawyer, many years ago he represented children and widows who were killed in a plane crash.
After earning a fair amount of settlement funds … Girardi has been accused of transferring the funds to your bank account.
On the other hand, some believe Jayne played an active role in this plan.
Yes, she filed for divorce from Girardi late last year … but only to help hide the assets she bought with those illegally obtained funds.
At least that’s the theory.
The longtime Bravostar denies knowing about Giradi’s cheating and claims that he divorced Tom. Because he always made a fool of her ..
But now, after Giradi has filed for bankruptcy in the face of these allegations, trustee Elissa Millerto comes to Erica.
Mirat is said to have paid for her “luxury lifestyle” with money from Giradi’s law firm.
“Grief cannot be supported by forgery,” Miller wrote in a lawsuit.
Jayne, along with EJ Global and Pretty Mess, is said to have received jewelry and other luxury items purchased with Giardi funds.
“Erica took a ridiculous stance for not receiving the payment directly. [firm] She is not responsible. “
“She tries to differentiate between giving her money directly and paying all bills directly.
“As with your previous retrial motion, the distinction is meaningless. All payments in your favor are your responsibility. “
According to the lawsuit, her American Express card was charged $ 14 million and an additional $ 11 million was paid to the grocery seller.
And even if Jane didn’t really know where that money was coming from?
If she hadn’t known that Giradi had embezzled money from previous customers, would he have been accused?
“What if it was a false charge? [she] We were allowed to walk for free without paying more than $ 25,000,000 for real estate, ”added Filing.
“Erica signed all tax returns and numerous credit card statements, and was familiar with spending money on the debtor’s credit card and paying for the debtor’s personal expenses.
“Your willful blindness and the Ostrich’s approach to these issues do not limit your liability.”
The trustee will ask the court to repay all of the property and pay interest.
In response to the trial, Erica’s attorney, Evan Borges, claimed that “no one was fooled” and “nothing was wrong,” saying:
“The fact that the Trustee continues to insist on claims based on a 12 year old statute-barred transaction is exaggerated and poised to harm Erica despite the law. Here is an example.
“Erica is defending the case and we are calling for sanctions and all appropriate legal remedies for claims made maliciously with no legal advantage.”
Edit delete
Erika Jayne is suing husband for $ 25 million in bankruptcy Erika Jayne is suing husband for $ 25 million in bankruptcy